Yum Motley Flavored!

We're here to collect the tears of all races. Stay nice and salty purebloods (non-mixed)!
  • You Mad Pureblood?
  • What This Blog Is Really About...
  • The Assorted Mods...
  • ask me anything
  • submit a post
  • rss
  • archive
  • yarriinwonderland:

    princesscisscum:

    commandercuddlebutt:

    commanderabutt:

    abunchofassholes:

    porrimpower:

    most “social justice warriors” are queer, poc, and/or women so that tells you a lot about anti-sj

    Actually, it tells you absolutely nothing.

    Unless you’re trying to say that disagreement = oppression…

    I’m bisexual, and I co-mod with two women, neither of them being purely ‘white’.

    So that tells you a lot about anyone who doesn’t like this blog.

    Most of the anti-sj are queer, poc, and/or women. So yeah.

    are those people blind or

    Bisexual Afro-latina who reads as purely Black. Fuck you tryna say? I have to agree with other folks like me? They’re definitely blind mija.

    Just a bunch of blind fools

    ~Mod KaTePe

    Source: porrimpower
    • 2 hours ago
    • 114 notes
  • deeplezstonerwitch:

topsidepress:

DONATE HERE
Cathy Brennan, radical “feminist” terrorist, has set her sights on a young black activist in Baltimore County, MD. Phylicia Sampson is being taken to court by Brennan, a notorious harasser of trans women and their supporters. Sampson is a recent college grad with few resources, no car and no way to fight back without your help.
As a community, we’ve suffered Brennan’s assaults for a long time—her blog is the best known for outing trans women’s personal information. She believes trans women are men who are infiltrating the feminist community and expends her resources fighting them. The idea that she is now taking her harassment to a legal venue is horrifying. That she has selected a young black woman with few resources to fight back is repugnant.
We can’t let Cathy Brennan get away with this! Share Phylicia’s campaign on Facebook, twitter, tumblr and instagram.  Here are some things you can do TODAY to help:
Tell your friends why it is important that they donate to this campaign. 
Donate what you can.
Write to your favorite feminist blog and ask them to cover this campaign
DONATE HERE

as someone who has dealt (in a pretty unserious way) with cathy brennan (she’s the one who called me a nightmare woman (hence my tumblr title) please donate whatever you can.

    deeplezstonerwitch:

    topsidepress:

    DONATE HERE

    Cathy Brennan, radical “feminist” terrorist, has set her sights on a young black activist in Baltimore County, MD. Phylicia Sampson is being taken to court by Brennan, a notorious harasser of trans women and their supporters. Sampson is a recent college grad with few resources, no car and no way to fight back without your help.

    As a community, we’ve suffered Brennan’s assaults for a long time—her blog is the best known for outing trans women’s personal information. She believes trans women are men who are infiltrating the feminist community and expends her resources fighting them. The idea that she is now taking her harassment to a legal venue is horrifying. That she has selected a young black woman with few resources to fight back is repugnant.

    We can’t let Cathy Brennan get away with this! Share Phylicia’s campaign on Facebook, twitter, tumblr and instagram.  Here are some things you can do TODAY to help:

    • Tell your friends why it is important that they donate to this campaign. 
    • Donate what you can.
    • Write to your favorite feminist blog and ask them to cover this campaign

    DONATE HERE

    as someone who has dealt (in a pretty unserious way) with cathy brennan (she’s the one who called me a nightmare woman (hence my tumblr title) please donate whatever you can.

    (via watchoutboy)

    Source: topsidepress
    • 3 hours ago
    • 2690 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • gryphknight:

    gryphknight:

    theperksofbeingseamus:

    Tumblr, teaching more about rape culture than they do in school

    *sigh*…in order then:

    1. A typical example of labeling “all the menz” as rapists.  Sorry, if I see someone that looks in need of help on the sidewalk or side of the road, I will continue to offer aid in a respectful manner.

    2. I’ll be sure to keep that in mind the next time a straight woman grabs my crotch or comes at me like a creature from Alien wanting to suck my life out through my mouth because she “luvs the gays and they luvs her” [/sarcasm].

    3. Actually not “creepy” although those words are a sign of being a douche that can’t control his mouth.  However, telling a female person that she looks nice, asking if she’s done something new with her hair, or asking where she got an outfit are perfectly acceptable comments and questions in a world where the recipient knows the difference between a compliment and creeping.

    4. No….”it” doesn’t assume these things.  Feminism — as expressed by the icons of it and RadFems — assumes these things.  It also incorrectly states that women are incapable of rape.

    5. Truth regardless of the sex / gender of either the rapist or victim.

    6. If that is true in all cases then you can throw out the advice littering the pages of many women-centric (marketed to women) magazines: flirting / coquettish behaviour, never be the first to phone the guy, “put a ring on it”, etc..  As “no” in all these cases will end any further contact with the man rather than being interpreted as a sign of possible future interest.

    7. See #5.

    8. How about we tell all our children to behave in a responsible and respectful manner?  Goddess forbid that we raise children that are prepared for adult interaction in the world….nope, better to raise our daughters to perceive themselves as constant victims — while supposedly empowering them — and our sons to “know” that they are “statistically likely” to rape a woman at some point in their life.

    Well done RadFems Feminism!!!  Could I ask that you please buy an island somewhere, live by the constraints of your fucked-up version of reality, petition the UN for official recognition and then announce yourselves to the world?  That way, I will know which country not to buy from in the future.

    EDIT: I included the 2nd picture as part of my 1st point as they give much the same message.

    (via yarriinwonderland)

    Source: workyardplaysard
    • 6 hours ago
    • 91121 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • postsatire:

    fatanarchy:

    calendar—girl:

    poeticnerd1990:

    Found Image number one on Project Unbreakable a while back, and as if my faith in humanity isn’t diminished enough, I found a link to image number two on reddit just now. Sometimes I really fucking hate people.

    Mhm let’s hear some more about how fat hatred isn’t a real thing and doesn’t do any “real” damage and we should be worrying about “real” issues like racism and sexism (as if those things don’t intersect at all). Silencing and mocking sexual assault survivors by making a “fat joke” isn’t enough “damage” for you people? (And this happens all the time).

    1. Clearly this is a horrible, cruel joke that some lazy simpleton with photoshop nailed together. There’s no excuse for it other than the First Amendment and that someone with a very bad sense of humour thought it might be funny. It’s not.

    2. Rape is not a function of how you dress or your weight. 

    That’s two things out of the way. I’d ask you to remember that I’ve taken these as given as your fevered feminism hits the roof during the following paragraphs.

    My interest in this piece is the three links in the last sentence: “all the time”. See those links? Those links are examples of how rape survivors are fat-shamed or whatever. Right? OK.

    The first link is by a guy who thinks that society should leverage its hatred for fat people by mentioning that girls who are raped tend to get depressed and overeat. Yes. That’s right. I read the whole bit. And I dismiss the entire thing as delusional gibberish. And if you’re using that as an example of how anyone in the real world feels, then you’re delusional too.

    The second link is by a lawyer who was making a specific defense, which is very badly paraphrased in the headline. Yes. That’s right. I read the whole thing. The headline says that the girl in question “should be glad of attention”, when the lawyer said no such thing. The lawyer actually said, as a hypothetical scenario in defense of his client, that she “may well have been glad of the attention” because she was very overweight at the time. Now, given that the entire argument of the fat-shaming people is that society is anti-fat, you’d think they’d understand that argument, even if they disagree with it. Personally, I think it’s specious. What do you think?

    The third link is a guy posting about the warning signs of a false rape accusation. It mentions nothing at all about being overweight, anywhere in the article. That’s right. I read the whole thing. You know, when you post links, there’s a danger that someone somewhere might read them. So make sure they say what you want them to say. As far as I’m concerned, there’s nothing wrong with publicizing the fact of false rape accusations, which happen all the time for all sorts of reasons. Tumblr feminists don’t really acknowledge them, or if they do, they dismiss them immediately as irrelevant, or (I swear I have actually seen this argument) a product of the patriarchy. 

    This is what happens when you believe in something like it’s a religion. It infects everything you think. You couldn’t just look at these photos and think, like all normal people, “I hope the guy who did this chokes on stick of his own shit”. You had to take it to a further, unnecessary, badly-researched level. 

    And that’s all on you. 

    (via princessfuckingprivilege)

    Source: poeticnerd1990
    • 8 hours ago
    • 750 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • kinkyturtle:

avri-wallflower:

sourcedumal:

Fuck special snowflakes who think like this.
Gurl bye
Your ass ain’t fucking special because you don’t wear makeup.
You’re not fucking better than the woman with large breasts who wears tank tops.
You’re a piece of shit because you are putting sexist stereotypes onto other women in some anti-feminine bullshit.

If you don’t like it, why’d you comment on it? I think it’s awesome and you’re probably one of the girls up there that wears makeup and shortshorts and tiny tanktops. And most kids today wear makeup because they think they aren’t pretty and need it. So deal with it. And get over yourself.

girl bye.
lemme tell you something: I wear tons of fucking make up. I wear short dresses. I walk around with a face that looks about as fake as it can get outside of a fucking barbie doll. and I like it that way. and, despite what you seem to think, no, it’s not because i think i’m ugly. i just fucking like makeup (and trust, i’ve spent years examining my own motivations and how they’re tied to internalized self-hated, fatphobia and misogyny so don’t EVEN cause you don’t know what you’re talking about).
I also read ravenously; engage in discourse regarding philosphy, art, economics, politics, race, gender, sexuality; make subversive art; and love comics and film and music. I’M A FUCKING PERSON IS WHAT I’M SAYING. 
like how fucking deep is this goddamn image when the spine of the book JUST SAYS THE WORD ‘BOOK’.
this kind of bullshit narrative, other than furthering a misogynistic dichotomy that pits women against each other, is also a complete fucking fallacy. A huge majority of average women DON’T DO THIS. you aren’t the lone plain jane in an army of cake-faced, bottle blonde barbies—if you look around, you’ll see that most women just throw on jeans and tops and very little makeup. 
I get that this kind of shit is an attempt to fight back against media-made images of what womanhood is supposed to be. I get it. (thought isn’t it interesting that the “weirdo” in the picture is still thin and conventionally attractive??)
but attacking other women who you perceive as being stupid or carbon copies because of their fucking appearance doesn’t fight back against shit. it actually does EXACTLY what the patriarchy wants us to do—engenders more hatred and competition between women. 
but you know, whatever, continue to think you’re so goddamn special. i’ll be over here reading AND wearing hot pink lipstick and having a hell of a time doing it. 

    kinkyturtle:

    avri-wallflower:

    sourcedumal:

    Fuck special snowflakes who think like this.

    Gurl bye

    Your ass ain’t fucking special because you don’t wear makeup.

    You’re not fucking better than the woman with large breasts who wears tank tops.

    You’re a piece of shit because you are putting sexist stereotypes onto other women in some anti-feminine bullshit.

    If you don’t like it, why’d you comment on it? I think it’s awesome and you’re probably one of the girls up there that wears makeup and shortshorts and tiny tanktops. And most kids today wear makeup because they think they aren’t pretty and need it. So deal with it. And get over yourself.

    girl bye.

    lemme tell you something: I wear tons of fucking make up. I wear short dresses. I walk around with a face that looks about as fake as it can get outside of a fucking barbie doll. and I like it that way. and, despite what you seem to think, no, it’s not because i think i’m ugly. i just fucking like makeup (and trust, i’ve spent years examining my own motivations and how they’re tied to internalized self-hated, fatphobia and misogyny so don’t EVEN cause you don’t know what you’re talking about).

    I also read ravenously; engage in discourse regarding philosphy, art, economics, politics, race, gender, sexuality; make subversive art; and love comics and film and music. I’M A FUCKING PERSON IS WHAT I’M SAYING. 

    like how fucking deep is this goddamn image when the spine of the book JUST SAYS THE WORD ‘BOOK’.

    this kind of bullshit narrative, other than furthering a misogynistic dichotomy that pits women against each other, is also a complete fucking fallacy. A huge majority of average women DON’T DO THIS. you aren’t the lone plain jane in an army of cake-faced, bottle blonde barbies—if you look around, you’ll see that most women just throw on jeans and tops and very little makeup. 

    I get that this kind of shit is an attempt to fight back against media-made images of what womanhood is supposed to be. I get it. (thought isn’t it interesting that the “weirdo” in the picture is still thin and conventionally attractive??)

    but attacking other women who you perceive as being stupid or carbon copies because of their fucking appearance doesn’t fight back against shit. it actually does EXACTLY what the patriarchy wants us to do—engenders more hatred and competition between women. 

    but you know, whatever, continue to think you’re so goddamn special. i’ll be over here reading AND wearing hot pink lipstick and having a hell of a time doing it. 

    (via zveen)

    Source: sourcedumal
    • 3 days ago
    • 49001 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • Regarding my thanks of Tumblr SJs.

    heirofmedusa:

    Alright, I promised I’d elaborate.

    So you’ve probably seen me mention SAPR before, which is the Navy’s Sexual Assault Prevention & Response program.

    Now, I like that the Navy is trying to take steps to help protect its Sailors and Officers from being assaulted by others and each other. However, that does not mean it is not beyond criticism.

    And my friends, most of that criticism has come from you guys. You who continuously speak out on how misogyny has perpetuated rape culture and allowed sexual assault numbers to rise.

    Well, never let any of these fuckheads tell you that talking about it does nothing, because SOMEONE has been listening.

    I went to our monthly SAPR training yesterday expecting two and half hours of slut shaming and glorifying masculinity and why women don’t really belong in the military or something…but imagine my shock and pride when the commander gave a presentation on rape culture.

    I mean…not just a presentation, he told us what it was. He called it what it was: the military perpetuates rape culture and the basis of this is rooted in misogyny.

    They addressed everything I’ve talked about that’s wrong with why the military can’t seem to get to the left of this issue. How the old heads higher in rank are still stuck in their ways, and still think of the military as a “Boys Only” organization and how they don’t see the women in the organization as people worthy of protection and respect in the same way they see a man.

    And I mean he went into detail about it. I spoke too. I spoke a lot. And I came forward about some of my own experience with assault in the military. Luckily, my chief—who was also a survivor—was behind me and beside me, giving me support. I mean, guys, I have never been more proud to be in the Navy than I was yesterday morning. And to see people from my department—mostly men—nodding in agreement, and realizing that change can happen if we simply own the problem and fix it, instead of trying to constantly sweep it under the rug.

    I think the Navy is learning to swallow its pride and admit that it’s not perfect, and that there’s need for improvement in a lot of areas, beginning with how women are treated and viewed in the workplace.

    And our commander blew it out of the water when he had me and a male shipmate come up. We divided the board into a male side and female side.

    Then, he asked the men: “What steps do you take to prevent sexual assault on your own person?”

    Here were the answers on the male side of the board:

    • Nothing
    • Play video games
    • Workout

    That was it. They didn’t have anything else. Most of them said they don’t even THINK about sexual assault. Mugging, yes, since we’re stationed in a shitty part of town, but sexual assault never even crosses their minds.

    He asked the females what steps we took to prevent sexual assault:

    • Self-defense classes.
    • Carrying mace.
    • Carrying knives.
    • Carrying a gun.
    • Avoid eye contact with suspicious strangers so as not to give the impression of an invitation.
    • Make one self unapproachable entirely.

    See what the commander was getting at, here? The men in the room looked shocked. Well, for the most part, most of them were glad we took such measures but the point was…why is it our Navy women feel the need to constantly live in fear of assault in ADDITION to being mugged than our Navy men?

    And that’s when it dawned on them what the problem was.

    In conclusion, the commander got his point across, and my master chief looks at me with a newfound respect for speaking even when I initially didn’t intend to pay attention at all.

    The Navy may not be perfect, but the fact that they are finally getting to the root of the problem proved to me that our discussions here DO MATTER. It’s not passive activism since so much media is filtered through Tumblr, now. So much pressure in the media is being put on the DoD to do something about the sexual assault, and I’m guessing someone has been reading Tumblr and learning about what rape culture is and how misogyny plays a huge role.

    So thank you. Keep talking. Keep discussing. Keep the fucking pressure on.

    It’s working.

    (via opus-pocus)

    Source: thegoddamazon
    • 3 days ago
    • 211 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • imperialfloraldivision:

    princessfuckingprivilege:

    mak3awiish:

    I just want to punch MRAs. ESPECIALLY FEMALE MRAs!!! 

    WHAT ARE YOU DOING? WHAAAAAAT ARRRRRE YOUUUU DOOOOING?! STAHP.

    Someone has different opinions. HULK SMASH.

    but i thought violence against women is bad

    Source: mak3awiish
    • 4 days ago
    • 98 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • anniesghost:

    permutationofninjas:

    shesatimorousbeastie:

    Wow I can’t believe someone is trying to convince me that 40% of rapists are women…it’s really obvious that they’re making up statistics or extrapolating data incorrectly… Here’s the facts I have.
    “In a survey answered by hundreds of rape and sexual assault support agencies, they estimated that 93.7 percent of male rape perpetrators are male and 6.3 percent were female. (Greenberg, Bruess and Haffner, 575)”

    Could you give more information on the source you have?  We can’t really find any real information on it.

    Regardless, your information is most likely wrong.  A quick glance at the CDC NISVS shows that, when forced envelopment is included, about 40% of rapes are perpetrated by females and about 60% are perpetrated by males.

    How is this making up statistics or extrapolating data incorrectly?

    People don’t even read the studies they cite before they cite them. How do you know the survey cited is even legitimate if you haven’t even seen the questions asked in the survey itself? I’m guessing they’re quoting this out of Exploring the Dimensions of Human Sexuality, which is a text book and, I think, comes as a Google e-book.

    As an aside, but definitely related, people don’t even realize Mary Koss, who is the one responsible for the ‘stat’ that 1 in 4 women will be raped or almost raped, specifically said in her study that she would only count male victims who were penetrated. And believe me, that was just one example of the many blatant exclusions of rape victims, including women who were raped by other women.

    And I quote:

    Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman.

    When you cite information that purposely overlooks victims of rape to make it look like men are exclusively the rapists and women exclusively the victims, then you are a rape apologist. No excuses, no “but but but”, no nothing. You are a rape apologist.

    Source: shesatimorousbeastie
    • 5 days ago
    • 32 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • chemicaltribe:

    Oh my god, old Irish proverbs are the best

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    image

    imageand my personal favourite

    image

    (via somefagonyourdash)

    Source: chemicaltribe
    • 6 days ago
    • 25209 notes
    • #mod katepe
  • special-snowflake-hall-of-fame:

logicadinfinitum:

movethefuckoverbro:

Are you fucking kidding with this?

what a cruel and heartless monster he is for not giving up his space on the floor for that woman

look at all that floor space oppression. what if a womyn wants to sit on the floor, huh? this is patriarchy. this is male entitlement.

    special-snowflake-hall-of-fame:

    logicadinfinitum:

    movethefuckoverbro:

    Are you fucking kidding with this?

    what a cruel and heartless monster he is for not giving up his space on the floor for that woman

    look at all that floor space oppression. what if a womyn wants to sit on the floor, huh? this is patriarchy. this is male entitlement.

    (via spacedoutsparrow)

    Source: movethefuckoverbro
    • 6 days ago
    • 185 notes
    • #mod katepe
© 2012–2013 Yum Motley Flavored!
Next page
  • Page 1 / 222